![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Does this make any sense to you?
A certain manufacturer of radio station automation systems uses the following scheme to record the lengths (i.e. durations) of audio cuts:
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 e8 3e = 1 second
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 f8 3e = 2 seconds
74 e5 01 c9 3a 57 fe 3e = 2.5 seconds
df bc 9a 78 56 34 02 3f = 3 seconds
f2 a1 a7 02 b3 b8 03 3f = 3.25 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 08 3f = 4 seconds
74 e5 01 c9 3a 57 0e 3f = 5 seconds
df bc 9a 78 56 34 12 3f = 6 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 18 3f = 8 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 28 3f = 16 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 38 3f = 32 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 48 3f = 64 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 58 3f = 128 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 68 3f = 256 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 78 3f = 512 seconds
It obviously has an exponential component, but there seems to be more to it than that.
I can't figure out why anyone in his right mind would record durations this way; most people just use an integer representing the number of milliseconds.
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 e8 3e = 1 second
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 f8 3e = 2 seconds
74 e5 01 c9 3a 57 fe 3e = 2.5 seconds
df bc 9a 78 56 34 02 3f = 3 seconds
f2 a1 a7 02 b3 b8 03 3f = 3.25 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 08 3f = 4 seconds
74 e5 01 c9 3a 57 0e 3f = 5 seconds
df bc 9a 78 56 34 12 3f = 6 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 18 3f = 8 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 28 3f = 16 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 38 3f = 32 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 48 3f = 64 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 58 3f = 128 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 68 3f = 256 seconds
29 51 ce a0 c8 45 78 3f = 512 seconds
It obviously has an exponential component, but there seems to be more to it than that.
I can't figure out why anyone in his right mind would record durations this way; most people just use an integer representing the number of milliseconds.